🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". A law is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," commented the MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to follow Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies strike a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this global debate unfolds, the policies of Australia and others indicate that states globally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.