🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.